



View Poll Results: Is moderation here biased??
- Voters
- 79. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
13 16.46% -
No
62 78.48% -
Unsure
4 5.06%
Thread: Is moderation here biased?
-
10th August 2007, 09:39 AM #106I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
My Other Toys
-
10th August 2007, 09:41 AM #107
And, while we are philosophising: I just noticed, Grunt, that your humorous take on alcohol is just an example of a universal principle:
Law I: A human must not waste anything or, through inaction, cause anything to be wasted
Law II: A human must, when requested, acquire more of anything for itself and others except where such orders would conflict with the first law
Law III: A human must make good use of anything as much as possible as long as such endeavour does not conflict with the first or second law.
-
10th August 2007, 09:42 AM #108
The point does not need debating, but since...
The rules state that we do not have to have a reason to delete a thread or post, but if was the one to delete your post then he wouldn't have done so without a reason.
Really get over it. You are not doing yourself any good trying to argue this point. If you really think that the moderation here is too much then go and try one of the American forums and post there. Then you will know over moderation!Have a nice day - Cheers
-
10th August 2007, 09:42 AM #109I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
My Other Toys
-
10th August 2007, 09:47 AM #110
-
10th August 2007, 10:07 AM #111
Aha! See how correct expression makes all the difference?
Really get over it. You are not doing yourself any good trying to argue this point. If you really think that the moderation here is too much then go and try one of the American forums and post there. Then you will know over moderation!
-
10th August 2007, 10:08 AM #112
F&E,
Here is something constructive. There is now a sub-forum devoted entirely to fishing. Go get 'em, tiger!Cheers,
Bob
-
10th August 2007, 10:14 AM #113
Yep, this is a fishing expedition.
From you, though, I was expecting more... I thougth you had the b***s to address the issue.
-
10th August 2007, 10:16 AM #114
-
10th August 2007, 10:16 AM #115Maybe, but I recon I'm the only one to get an infringment notice because of a cooking thread!Photo Gallery
-
10th August 2007, 10:29 AM #116
This is the second time in as many days that someone has questioned whether or not I have blokely bits. Linden Hardy had a shot (in jest, I believe), and now F&E. I'm beginning to feel emasculated (look it up).
The moderation here is the free market at its best. Neil owns it and Neil decides. Simple, really. Don't like it? Buggar off. (Not directed at anyone in particular, just a statement of fact.) I've had a few posts deleted, and rightly so. But F&E, you are a sly dog. If I am a possum stirrer (and I am), you are a fisherman of the first water.
If you wish to have a discussion of some depth, open a thread to that effect in the proper sub-forum and I will respond. I am one of those blokes with a high IQ who is so Stupid. I have more education than I can use and so would be glad to slough some of it off on those who can use it.
There are no smilies in this post, becaue I am not smiling. But, again, I am not angry, either, just puzzled. What in the world do you want?
[NB: Kiss this post goodbye, I suppose.]Cheers,
Bob
-
10th August 2007, 10:40 AM #117
It would actually be a far better forum if the threads were all wood related.
As for the non-wood stuff, I'd prefer all of it to be moderated out!!
... yes, I sometimes like being provocative."... it is better to succeed in originality than to fail in imitation" (Herman Melville's letters)
-
10th August 2007, 10:40 AM #118
-
10th August 2007, 10:42 AM #119
-
10th August 2007, 10:42 AM #120I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
My Other Toys
Bookmarks