Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Pine vs Cypress

  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    in the outer reaches of Sth Oz
    Age
    76
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Pinus I reckon.... the 50's still had some good pinus not like the weed of today
    but then I know nothing
    Pete
    What this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
    Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne - Outer East Foothills
    Posts
    1,557
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    For what it's worth, I'd go with the baltic theory but whatever it is.........just get into it, it look snice.
    If at first you don't succeed, give something else a go. Life is far too short to waste time trying.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    3,208
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Its definately Radiata Pine.
    The growth rings are far too coarse for Baltic.
    Regards, Bob Thomas

    www.wombatsawmill.com

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kilmore, near Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    67
    Posts
    781
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yup - radiata..... no doubt whatsoever - it is nothing like Baltic.
    Steve
    Kilmore (Melbourne-ish)
    Australia

    ....catchy phrase here

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kyabram. Vic
    Posts
    55
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Clear radiata pine.
    Ken

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •