2 Attachment(s)
Advice on restoring/fixing a cabinet
Hi all,
I've been asked to effect a repair on a cabinet. I know nothing of its age or worth.
Fixing it isnt really too much of a problem, but I do have a couple of questions from those in the know....
-- Just by looking, is it possible that someone might be able to guess the timber?
-- Is it best practice to restore in a manner that isn't perfect? i.e. its very good and very close... rather than 100% spot on?
-- I can do the perfect repair, or very close. Is this a standard that repairers adhere to?
Attachment 369173 Attachment 369174
Seems to have some age to it
I can see why the previous poster thinks it is possible that this is a repro as the design is so common that there are many reproductions of it. Without seeing it in actuality it can be difficult to assess. However, overall, I am inclined to agree with mark david that it is 1880's mahogany. The figure in the timber seems to be formed by parenchyma bands (lighter tissue) rather than lines of pores (ring porous timbers include Australian cedar). The age is also given away by the wear marks, the darkness in the crevices and the white speckles in the timber. Late in the 19th century French polishers used a light coloured filler stained to match the timber colour (probably Plaster of Paris I have been told). Unfortunately the stain they used was not a solid, stable colour (technically it was what was called fugitive) so has faded back to light speckles in time. Late 19th century mahogany furniture is currently worth very little, although it may have been purchased for quite a lot of money. The value cycle is low for it at the moment but it will come back in time as people realise the quality of the cabinet making and timbers are so superior to current fabricated board cabinet work. it is therefore important to treat it with the respect it deserves.
IMHO a good repair of an antique removes as little original material as possible and matches as closely as possible to the original so as to become almost invisible. Now, there is a school of thought amongst academic restoration experts that repairs should be perfect in terms of joinery and fit etc. but be painted grey or some such to stand out and make clear that they are repairs. I completely disagree with that school.
Most restoration experts would recommend that the repair be glued in with a reversible glue such as hide glue and that the finish be exactly the same as the original - i.e. brown button shellac (not orange flake please). I do not believe however that you need to grain fill with stained or unstained plaster of Paris - just make the repair as minimal and least obvious as you can. Hide glues work very well and have been proven over hundreds of years so there is no valid concern about their quality.
Good luck
David
look for the damaged ones
Damaged old furniture is especially cheap (virtually worthless) and can be a good source of timber.
Thanks - that is a better source for the same article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fuzzie
Hi Franklin,
It is exactly the same article. Thanks for the link as that will help other readers of these forums:2tsup:. I found the article reprinted somewhere with only his name as credit so I didn't get the link. I do not agree with the "art of manliness" bit. Especially as the best antiques restorer still working in my area is a woman!
Regards
David
Books on restoration or related
As an addition to my earlier response I wanted to mention that not all books or articles on restoration are good to follow. Just like in building restoration there was a phase where "professionals" were very impressed with new materials and believed, incorrectly, that they were automatically superior to the old ways. For example, soft lime mortars were replaced by "better" hard cement mortars - and that resulted in ghastly damage to old stone and brisk buildings (lime mortar let water out but the cement mortar was impervious so the water and salts rotted away the adjacent stone and or brick).
Likewise, some restoration "professionals" enthusiastically embraced modern techniques and adhesives without understanding the damage they were doing and the reduction in value their repairs caused. I have a book by a Frenchman, Michael Doussy, Antiques professional Secrets for the Amateur 1977 Book Club Associates, London, that exemplifies how not to do it. He includes techniques that remove original material and recommends the use of inappropriate adhesives from vinyl to contact adhesives. I pity the people who will have to make good his style of repairs later on.
Some older books however, were much better than others and a couple may be available in second hand bookstores locally or on-line if forumites are interested. The ones that I have are not necessarily the definitive books on the subject, they are just the examples that I picked up along the way.
Charles Harding, Furniture Doctoring and French Polishing, 1970, W. Foulsham and Co, London, (0-572-00710-8 may be the SBN), was a very useful book for me when I was first learning.
Other books that are useful and informative have focussed on the frequency of reproduction or faked furniture being passed off as antiques. One example of these books is an old one that I have by W. Crowley, Is It Genuine? A Guide to the Identification of Eighteenth-Century English Furniture, 1971 Eyre & Spottiswoode, London (but relevant to later periods too).
One much lighter book that forumites interested in furniture history and restoration may enjoy is by Norman Lindsay Dust or Polish. I do not have the other details because the person I lent the book to some years ago has not returned it - but it is a fun read.
The Furniture History Society (UK) Home | Furniture History Society or the Australian Furniture History Society The Furniture History Society publish journals with interesting articles on antique furniture and the Australiana Society publishes a high quality colour magazine with lots of information about some fascinating items of Australiana including furniture.
If there is any interest I can also list some of the furniture books that I own, but this post is probably quite long enough for now and I need to get some workshop time!
David