I was reading an article on wipe-on-finishes in the Australian Woodsmith the other night. Seems the author doesn't have a very high opinion of one of my favoured finishes being tung oil. His/her description of Tung Oil characteristics does not match my own experiences leading me to several possible conclusions:
1.) I am an Idiot
2.) The author is an Idiot
3.) Our opinions vary because of the products on the market.
My thinking is that 1.) & 3.) are considerably more likely than 2.) {and less likely to result in a law suit}:) . So I'd like to discard 1.) as this theory has been well tested and proven on a regular basis.
Coincidentally a BB member told me a lot of what is sold as "Tung Oil" contains polyurethane. Unfortunatley I don't have a can on hand and when I buy Tung Oil I just tend to grab a can off the shelf from any manufacturer I recognise and the price is decent. I have also never really read the can in detail other than the thinning/clean-up/safety etc stuff.
So am I being lead up the proverbial, wool pulled over eyes, and what is getting around as "Tung Oil" is actually a mix:( .
I noticed the author stated Pure Tung Oil several times. I thought Tung Oil was...well..Tung Oil, or is it a case of what Sol says?. Does anybody have a can with some fine print that states what is actually in it?.
Should I be looking for pure tung oil?... Has anybody seen Elvis latley? ;)