Originally Posted by
silentC
Well, if evidence was proof, then all court cases would get a guilty verdict, would they not?
what does beyond reasonable doubt refer to then ?
Cases are decided on probability ie balance of evidence all the time.
The fact that a very, very large number of people believe in him.
Something makes them feel that way
Do you honestly consider belief in something to be evidence of existance...pa lease:rolleyes: . Extending that logic to my case " if i believe god doesnt exist therefore he musnt" case closed...sounds silly doesnt it
Does that mean Santa really did exist when I was a kid ? If so what happened to him.:D
There are documents saying that he exists.
In the case of texts documenting the life of Jesus. Natural history or evidence based history as shown that they are historically dubious
There are events which people say are evidence.
Again they believe... Scientifically miracles dont constitute evidence because they can also have a more probable natural explanation
Like I say, I am more in favour of the negative side.
If there is no evidence, then why are you not a 7?
But there is evidence...science is full of evidence...addmitedly science doesnt have all the answers yet , so i think it is more than resonable to delay my 100% conviction that there is no God