A monkey and a dog arguing religion, this is a good day
Printable View
A monkey and a dog arguing religion, this is a good day
Sounds to me like a bunch of idiots with too much time on their hands.Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayD99
:p
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruddigar
Freaks, actually. Freaks. That is what some say.:C It's hurtful.
I once heard James Morrison (yes, the trumpet player) and well known explainer of things, say that he has a feeling that the more difficult things are to understand the more important they are. He used the examples of (in increasing degrees of perplexity), electricity, love, God.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Dog or is it silentC, I'm confused!
Perhaps he had a point.
On the other had Douglas Adams had another take:
He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife.Quote:
There is a theory which states that if anyone discovers just exactly what the universe is for and why we are here, that it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. Then there is a theory which states that this has already happened.
or
Now it is such a bizarrely improbably coincidence that anything so mindbogglingly useful [the Babel fish] could have evolved by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED"
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
Hmmm...
P (resorting to quoting others)
:p :p
They are not my terms.Quote:
You can call it what ever you want
Well, if evidence was proof, then all court cases would get a guilty verdict, would they not?Quote:
Why not, isnt that how court cases are decided every day...why cant I apply the same logic to the religion debate ?
The fact that a very, very large number of people believe in him. Something makes them feel that way. There are documents saying that he exists. There are events which people say are evidence. Like I say, I am more in favour of the negative side.Quote:
I dispute that there is any evidence for God.
If there is no evidence, then why are you not a 7?
James Morrison never had to decide which table saw to buy under $2,000 did he......Quote:
Originally Posted by bitingmidge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruddigar
Thanks for that Ruddigar :).
... is the boss and he is right that there are problably better places to discuss these things. And of course I will cease and desist if my posts are not wanted or contributing in anyway. I guess it is inevitable that dicussions on this topic so often lead to heads becoming hot :rolleyes: . I just think it is a sad that a theist and an atheist cant have a pleasant, freindly and interesting debate about their beliefs( by that I dont mean just this forum but in general)
cheers
BD:2tsup:
A truly wonderous discussion is taking place here, and I'm starting to get the point...
This you say, is indeed god-like, therefore there is a God?
All hail the great and hairy godQuote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mac
Does have a personalised plate then?
A X E - M A N
You would want to spell that one correct, or you may end up in a Seinfeld episodeQuote:
Originally Posted by Ruddigar
Ignore him, he is a stirrer. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Brown Dog
Picture the biggest.... ugliest... hairiest.... Kindergarten teacher you could ever imagine. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mac
So you have met my wife then:U:UQuote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
is really Mrs Godfrey!? :oo:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers