Numbers. They ain't add up.
My comments have been divergent and I dont wish to paint myself as a tin-foil hatter :) :)
BUT, someone made an interesting comment once, in passing.
It was fairly simple and flippant, but it stayed with me. It was essentially:.... why would you lock up 750 million people because 3000 died?
Id imagine in a city of 30 million (Wuhan) that that many people must die of falling down stairs every day. Or choke on hot chips. Or go under buses.
Lets try to turn this situation on its head....
What would be so bad, that needed stopping with such incredible urgency, that it required giving your entire economy a heart attack, paralysing it for 2 months and locking up 700, or 750, million people, in their homes?
Do you really think its to slow down a COLD/FLU that they don't really know much about, that officially killed 1000 people at the time.... or is it possibly something much much much bigger than that?
Imagine I'm a Chinese CDC pleb and say to The Boss... "Gee boss. Seems there's a problem. A Lot (50k) people are coughing badly and 1k have died over the last month. Can I stop the entire economy of China for 2 months, Just In Case"
Boss: "No. No you fecun can't" would be the reply.....
OR I say "Boss. The hospitals are chocka-block, 1 million are sick, 50k have died today and it seems to spread to people just being the in the same room for 5 minutes"......
Boss: "Hmmmm, you have my attention...".
Really, do you believe to ONE SECOND that out of 750,000,000 people under quarantine that 3,000 have died?
Really? Lets do the maths. 365 days a year. A person lives 100 years (its a miracle!) that means that for 750M people, 20,500 people die of OLD AGE every day.
and we lock down a civilisation for 2 months based on 1000 dieing over a period of weeks?
Nope. Nope. Don't buy it for a second.