"...Since the early fifteenth century, for example, trump has served as a synonym for fart, or rather to denote an especially noisy fart. ..."
(A Dictionary of Culinary Curiosities) by Mark Morton
Printable View
Greg
There is a distinct anomaly in the American system where because there is no compulsory voting the successful candidate can win with the approval of only a quarter of the electorate. In fact Trump, you may recall, won despite Clinton attracting more votes, because of the College vote factor (another anomaly to my mind). In 2016 55.7% of the VAP (voting age population) voted ( Voter turnout in the United States presidential elections - Wikipedia ), but that includes quite a large percentage of ineligible voters too, so the actual percentage of eligible voters is smaller. To make the sums easier for my simple mind I have called it 50% and I don't think it would be far off.
From the States a Forum member has confirmed to me that Trump's popularity amongst his supporters has not noticeably waned. It could be that they continue to believe his rhetoric, despite the statistics, possibly because they want to believe. On the other hand, outside of the US his words and recent condemnation of the WHO are mainly seen as disgraceful and a blatant grab to delegate blame and attempt to maintain popularity. This is seen as particularly inappropriate at a time when so much of the world is suffering and the US is demonstrating bully tactics with medical supplies.
I suspect that there are mainly elements of "f" in your summary above. You could have added there is also the sentiment that the Americans are getting what they deserve: However, I would suggest that is a view that lacks compassion as no one except maybe the man at the top deserves to go through this pandemic, if it was avoidable.
Regards
Paul
Your Grandfather was also one tough man as well,
Straight lemon juice into any cuts on your hands is pure hell.
As one ex metal worker to another, I understand the ten minutes it’s takes to scrub your hands and arms clean at the end of the day.
An then the reminder of that cut you got at 10.45 am that you forgot about.
Paint thinners are also excellent cut finders!!
Cheers Matt,
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
As Justonething points out those ratings only apply to the US. To be more precise, since the first 30 days of his presidency, he recently reached an all polls approval high of 45.8% when he started his daily press conferences on the virus. It has started to drop again as the press conferences have degenerated into the Donald show. He has the lowest ratings of ten presidents over the last ninety years. But, that could just be fake news.
Here are his ratings over his presidency, so far.
How Popular Is Donald Trump? | FiveThirtyEight
As for his international ratings...
How the world sees the U.S. and Trump in 10 charts | Pew Research Center
For me he is a symptom and not the cause of a deep malaise in the US. Donald is a worry, but even more troubling for me is that over 45% of its population still approves of his performance this far into his presidency.
In keeping with the forum rules, I attempt to avoid making comments of a political nature on local politics here in Australia. Having a bit of a grizzle is another matter.
However, I would think that offshore politics is different and that making fun of Donald is fair game. The US citizens may feel the need to respect their president, we don't. Although we don't get to vote on their president, their choices do have an impact on us, so we should at least have the right to express our derision if we see fit to do so. I don't see this as being any more political than ridiculing such leaders as "His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire (CBE) in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular", and last King of Scotland!
But, as always, I respect the decisions of the moderators.
I'm not in the hate camp. If I was a yank, i'd vote for Trump. He seems to have been doing a pretty good job before corona. Pretty good doesn't mean great, nor bad, he's just a politician but at least he doesn't cower to the left leaning muppets of the press. So he gets a thumbs up from me on that point alone. I'm no fool, he has royally screwed up with corona and now is playing a blame game with WHO and China. If he gets re-elected, I fear he will take that as a mandate to continue to shoot his mouth off at China which will possibly end up being a prelude to war. War between China and USA.....god help us all!
Be like LEGO people,people
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...1ffaa3b44b.jpg
Cheers Matt.
Looking again this morning at the modelling for the USA that I have been regularly following, they are still tracking close to the projection of about 70k deaths by 4 August, provided they retain full social distancing to the end of May.
The projection for today (17 April) was about 32K total deaths and Woldometer is reporting about 34.5k. The number bounce around a bit, but at this rate they may do better than Spain and Italy per capita, but the projections for those (see pull down country options) are nearing their peak whereas the USA has a long way to go yet and there is still a lot of upside uncertainty built into the US projections.
Remove the social distancing that is built into the modelling for each of the countries/locations before the end of May and that will produce very different projected outcomes.
See third chart here.
There is a lot of very rich data in the modelling, like the projected peak and ICU bed shortages at peak demand. No wonder Spain, Italy, the UK and New York have struggled as can be clearly seen by pulling down the charts for each of those places.
Note: Many countries, large and small, are included in the modelling, but not Australia. Why am I'm not surprised!
Are you listing centre right publications in an attempt to sway my view that Trump doesn't cower to "left" leaning muppets of the press? You quoted what I said, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you actually read what I said.
according to this source Why B.C.'''s top doctor still believes mass testing isn'''t the way to stop COVID-19 | CBC News the Covid-19 "test" can deliver a false negative result 30% of the time. Just to clarify 30% of patients testing negative to the virus are actually positive to the virus. At that rate of false negatives I think it's more than appropriate that I describe the Covid-19 test as "test".
What is scary, at least for me, is that according to a radio interview with a Canadian virologist on CBC this afternoon (Thursday April 16) the rate of false negatives INCREASES from 10% to 30% as the duration of the infection increases.
Good to see, then, that my old mum in the UK is taking the appropriate precautions:
Attachment 471892
Remember when we were crowing about ticking over post #1,000?
Remember when we were predicting 100,000 deaths in Australia
As a retired burgler I can assure you that plenty of men don’t wash their hands after going to the toilet, number 2’s included
Is it true that in SA they've introduced new random breath testing? But for Covid19, not booze? Is it also true that all the new booze busses include an ICU?
I'm curious...how does a burglar know that? (not that I'm doubting what you say...)
Nobody on this thread was predicting that without giving the qualification.... "unless significant steps are taken."
https://www.woodworkforums.com/f43/c.../5#post2177629
But, thankfully Australia did take the necessary steps to avoid that worst case scenario against a push back from some quarters (well much less than that) of the media.
Prof Paul Kelly (Dep CMO) is not ruling out making downloading their tracking app compulsory. "I think we'll start with it being voluntary and see how it goes." he said in response to a journalist asking him if it could become compulsory. PPK is no doubt only acting from a public health point of view, and may not be seeing the potentially sinister side of the idea.
My partner has lived through the various Police State/Military Juntas of Argentina in the 70s and 80s, and understandably she is not at all happy about it.
Some questions that I can think of:
- What guarantee do we have that the data will not be used for anything else? Certainly mobile phone movements can currently be traced, but that requires a warrant or court order AFAIK.
- What guarantee do we have that this is not the thin end of the surveillance wedge, and that the surveilling will not continue after the pandemic crisis is finished because Mr Potato Head can now track us all?
- What guarantee do we have that this golden opportunity to turn it into an Australia Card on steroids will not be taken?
- Do they really need that data, given that Australia is more or less leading the western world in controlling the virus?
I will wait to see what answers we can get to those or similar questions before I decide one way or another, but atm I am very sceptical of trusting a Govt of any flavour with that sort of data.
How do you all feel about the Govt knowing where you are at any given time?
Ian
That makes me wonder if it is a result of mutation. Around the world the virus is not exactly the same because of at least three mutations, but I don't know the details ( or exact numbers of mutations ) and I don't know how the tests are conducted and the criteria that is examined.
Regards
Paul
Under normal circumstances, no way!
Data security, proscribed uses and a legislated sunset clause would be prerequisites before I would be prepared to consider giving my location in return for a well justified benefit for myself and others.
The right to exit and for all data to be deleted would also be a consideration.
And, the responsible minister would be another factor in my decision making.
On the surface, it seems like a good idea. I personally don't care if the government know where I am though I am technically against it without having any great reason except for 'there is always some greedy bugger with access to power and he is dumb enough to use it for his own personal gain, often at the cost of the great many".
from Virus mobile tracking app may be mandatory | The Canberra Times | Canberra, ACT
Today, I have been at work, been to Maccas, KFC (in the shopping center) and the fush n chup shop (at a different shopping center). The app will have registered me working alongside the workmates, but not maccas, kfc or fush n chups because I was in and out quick as a flash each time. I would remember if I was at work for any standard business day, but I wouldn't need to remember because the business will be shut down for 14 days as soon as I get confirmed infected anyway.Quote:
It uses Bluetooth to plot people who had spent 15 minutes or more in close proximity to a person with coronavirus.
so for the most part, the tracking app gains the government SFA with me, because I would be able to tell them I was at work.
however, also from the same above linked article.
If I wanted to hang out with mates for an extended period during the day (we can't at the moment), the government will want better tracking/tracing capacity. Which effectively means we have a choice. Go outside and be tracked, or stay in lock down until a vaccine is produced or suitable treatment is discovered. The government wants the economy back up and running, as I'm sure we all do, so do we really have a choice at all? I think not. But it is nice that they pretended to ask.Quote:
Better contact tracing is one of three main benchmarks the government wants to meet before strict restrictions can be lifted.