should I report this post -- Nah
but I do get a bit incensed by this constant bagging of "Turnbull's NBN".
In terms of usability and, more importantly, affordability to the average punter, there is nothing to choose between the Rudd/Gillard FTTP NBN and Turnbull's FTTN version. Except possibly the final out-turn cost.
To keep the $50+ billion cost off the Government's books, the NBN is required to generate a "commercial" return -- which I believe needs to be in the order of $5 billion per year. With only 1 in 5 consumers willing (able?) to pay for the politically promised performance, this means the vast bulk of consumers are left with what are unaffordable prices or appallingly slow speeds. Or a mixture of both.
As I understand the finances, there is no "fix" to this problem unless the Government -- of whichever flavour has the balls -- bites the bullet and brings the "investment" onto Treasury's books, effectively writing off the NBN's cost.