Huge increase in accuracy for only $14!

MYOPIC tendencies prove out now more so now that the "baby boomers" had their way with life and it's luver'ly excess's :rolleyes:

It would'nt be the copious amounts of salubrious nectar in a good filtered 12yr whiskey or a consumate liking to a fine red that has prevailed over the years that now ascribes to partial blindness that ails all of thee methinks ...just the liking for a fine drop irrespective of the genes list!

personally copious amounts of either go down well ....its the staying power that has diminished...oh and along with the eye's which give out first these day's.

Seriously tho only use specs for occasional reading ,not required in the shed yet ...hmmm is that why they say measure twice cut once :eek: :eek:

Cheers :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by E. maculata

Methinks Peter u talk with forked tongue
:p either that or you have discover the governments elusive 30 percent of specialists whom bulk bill :rolleyes:

---

No forked tongue and yes it is hard to believe but it is true.

It may help that my wife, because of her diabetes, has been seeing him for about 15 years with regular checkups and laser surgery in her eyes to stop bleedings and finally culminating last year with four eye operations to restore sight. All this time he has bulkbilled her but I don't know about newer clients. Anyway I'm not complaining. :D :D :D


Peter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by John Saxton

It would'nt be the copious amounts of salubrious nectar in a good filtered 12yr whiskey or a consumate liking to a fine red that has prevailed over the years that now ascribes to partial blindness that ails all of thee methinks ...just the liking for a fine drop irrespective of the genes list!

---

JOhn, if Margaret River and Ireland dissapear overnight, you are going to be buggered................................and leave my Glenlivet alone, it's mine.

Hi all

I have been a lifetime spec wearer, and have heard all the OWT's over the years, and being of analytical mind, have also formed some opinions of my own. Here you can have them, all mixed up.

Regarding the "wearing specs weakens the eyes" one, if you have defective eyesight, your eye muscles are working overtime, trying to force your lens to the point where something will come into focus. (think pumpin' iron.) They become very strong, and good at doing that. They do this at the expense of eye strain, headaches, missing what is going on around you etc. When you fix the problem, by sticking specs in front, you remove the strain, they don't have to work so hard, so they will start to atrophy, BACK TO THE LEVEL OF STRENGTH THEY WERE ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO HAVE! And yes, your vision without the specs will be worse, but so what? When I started, (in the 50's), the quack advised my parents not to let me wear them all the time. This, added to the "geek" image, ensured that I missed most of went on anywhere except on the blackboard during my school years. (I can remember the torment of plucking up the courage to cross the expanse of dance floor, only to find as I got within arms' length, (and too close to duck out) that I was approaching a dog, or the school hood's girlfriend, or my sister!)

My kids wear specs, and I have been careful not to have the same mistakes made. My son really only needs them for reading, And my daughter (now 14) has had contacts as well as specs for 3 years to avoid the vanity issue. Things have also changed, and optometrists now no longer reccomend that specs not be worn except when unavoidable. In fact at my latest visit, he confided in me that only recently has accepted practice changed from prescribing only the minimum prescription possible, to setting the ideal prescription. I take this to be a comfirmation of my beliefs.

I have always worn specs, and occasionally contacts, but have always had toughened lenses. I must say that it beats the **** out of having to carry, and wear safety glasses at work, (or in the shed) like all those poor fully sighted dudes. (And I have replaced some pairs as a result of damage, which could have been my eye.)

Regarding Laser, (and the earlier radial keratotomy (sp)) procedures, I have considered them over the years, and have always chickened out. It is a very final step, and a procedure which is not 100% flawless. I have heard horror stories, (and in the latter case seen one, culminating in a cornea replacement)

Regarding the Optometrist/ Opthalmologist debate, the only bad specs I have had, came from the latter. They are different specialities. The latter are experts in the health of the eye, who also know how to test vision. The former specialise in the testing and correction of eye defects, and also are aware of eye health issues. Go Figure, commercial issues and greed apart.

Regarding vision changes, my specs needed changing yearly during my school years, 2 - 3 yearly during my 20's & 30's. Recently I have had only minor corrections in 1989, and 1999, and then only as my old specs were poked, and had to be replaced anyway. I am probably due for a change again soon, as my arms are starting to get shorter.

Rant off!

Regards

Alastair,
Like you I spent most of my life wearing glasses.
I developed cataracts a few years ago and the opthamologist didn't want to touch them until they had fully developed. The upshot was that very short sight combined with the cataracts meant I went a couple of years where I couldn't even read a newspaper or see the TV let alone do any woodwork or drive my ute.
After the cataract surgery I have the best vision I have ever had without glasses. It took a lot of self education to get into the habit of wearing protective glasses.
So I've been on both sides and prefer not wearing glasses.

Quote:

---

When you fix the problem, by sticking specs in front, you remove the strain, they don't have to work so hard, so they will start to atrophy, BACK TO THE LEVEL OF STRENGTH THEY WERE ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO HAVE! And yes, your vision without the specs will be worse, but so what?

---

Following that logic, you would have to make sure that the glasses you were wearing approximated the original focus that your eyes would have had, so that your eyes can return to normal. I suppose that is where getting your eyes tested and prescriptiopn glasses comes in?

In my case, I was given glasses and told that they would take awhile to get used to. What he meant was that my eye muscles would take awhile to get weak enough to see with them. I chucked them out and 16 years later I still don't wear or need them. So I wonder where I would be now if I had worn them?

Silent & Bob

The only "getting used to" I recall, (and the same is true for others I know), was adjusting to the distortion inherent in the lenses, remembering that I have always had a BIG correction. It was not a case of waiting to adjust to the focussing, if that is what Darren means. Because specs are a single, simple lens, they will always distort to some extent, unlike a camera lens, for instance. What I believe happens, is that your brain adjusts its perception, so that it sees the image as "perfect". I don't "see" a distorted image, even though if I look for it, I can see the image distort if I move my head.

I have also worn contacts to varying degrees since '85. What I found was that there was a profound psychological benefit to contacts. I am less introverted, and more confident when wearing them. Perhaps this ties up with what Bob felt. On the other hand, for me they have always also been a problem practically, not lending themselves sympathetically to all night drunken smoky parties in my bachelor days, windy and dusty airfields and beaches when I was diving and skydiving, spraypaint and ammonia and airconditioning at work, and lately, dust when turning and woodworking. The hassle of maintaining them also has resulted in them being put in the "too hard " box a lot of the time. I am in the process of getting back into them for weekly wear, but will stick with the specs over w/e, when I am mostly in the shed.

Regards.

What I found was that when I put them on, everything was blurred (as you would expect) and it would take awhile for my eyes to adjust to the new focal length. After a minute or two, I could see normally but they gave me a strange, disconnected sort of feeling and made me feel a bit crook. Hard to explain, maybe like vertigo, although I wouldn't know because I've never suffered from it. The opo said that would pass after a few days/weeks of wearing them. I couldn't stand wearing them so I chucked them out.

My wife got the laser surgery done and it changed her life. She had all the same problems as you. Couldn't stand wearing contacts for long, hated wearing glasses. Being a sportswoman, this was a major hassle for her. So, she had both eyes done, put up with 'sand in the eyes' for a day and has never regretted it since. I suppose time will tell if it reverses or her eyeballs pop but in the meantime, she would never want to go back to the specs.

The problem with our brand of "backyard diagnosis" strategem on human parts is that we confuse ourselves by trying to use mechanical rationale on biological issues. Silent may well be right for His pecularities, ;) whereas the nausea/ insular feelings he describes while wearing glasses is the same for me, :( ,,,,,but in my situation I cannot continue to fool/irrationalise to myself that I don't need glasses, when blind Freddy can see my measuring is far better with them on.

My two bob's worth:-

I've been wearing glasses since I was 16 years old. I've had an astigmatism in my left eye for most of my life that has caused distortion in my distance vision. Since the age of 40, I've needed a prescription to help me see properly when reading. The glasses I'm wearing right now have graduated lenses: distance vision at the top, computer screen in the middle and reading at the bottom.

When I first started wearing this type of multi-focal lens, my optician told me that I would have to change the angle of my head in order to bring the appropriate focal length into play (looking down my nose in order to read, for example) and that, after a time, I would do this unconsciously as I became accustomed to the change. She was right.

I think I understand what Darren (silentC) is talking about when he cites the feeling of disconnection. Like him, I've never suffered from vertigo so the feeling I've experienced once or twice when adjusting to a significantly different prescription may or may not be similar to vertigo - I don't know. Because I can't see at all well without glasses, I've always pressed on and made the necessary adjustment.

Getting back to Mick's original post: I've got an el cheapo pair of magnifying glasses that I occasionally use when I need to study something really small. They work pretty well.

As for the issue of glasses versus contact lenses, my own experience is that I have never felt either inconvenienced or disadvantaged by wearing glasses (for over 40 years now). I've never tried contact lenses and I don't think I ever will.

Col

Col that was my attitude too. I was extremely myoptic and astigmatic, the cataracts sent me blind. After the op I was astounded to have perfect vision. I could see things like the tiny twigs on top of a fully grown messmate etc. But it had to be forced on me.

Bob

I'm delighted for you that you have had such a successful result from cataract surgery. Having to suffer with near blindness for a couple of years must have been a lousy experience.

Like Alastair, I've chickened out of the prospect of corrective laser surgery. Because I don't find it inconvenient to have to wear glasses, and because I can see pretty well when I'm wearing them, I'm not going to subject myself to the risks associated with surgery (however slight they may be).

Col

I use glasses like these (http://www.lifewithease.com/clipon_flipup.html) when fishing, I'm gettin' a pair for the shop!!!

Weird, I can hit a 24" target at 300 yards with an 1850's musket, but can't read the damn paper... so I'll just shoot the paper!

Another interesting one.


Regarding the long wait for cataract surgery:

(Assuming that this was not due to the medicare crisis-----!!!)

When my late mom had cataract surgery some 15 years ago, (and in another country), she was told that this was an arcane practice dating from the earlier days of cataract surgery, when lenticular implants had not been developed. Because with the lenses removed by the surgery, your ability to focus was completely gone, and had to be replaced by impossibly heavy prescriptions, and these were good only for one distance, the practice was to virtually let you go blind from the cataract first, so that when removed, even the very ordinary vision you were left with was seen as an improvement.
In her case, the surgery was done as soon as she became significantly handicapped by the cataract, ie unable to read or watch telly. She did find the post op a problem, and took some time, and several changes to her specs, but once right, never looked back.

Great idea Mick!! :cool:

I use them cheepo glasses at work on the mine to read my daily instruction sheet and locations damned typists!! Flamin use the smallest bloody font possible! but hadnt thought of that idea...

Anyone know if theyve created a cure a pair of glasses whatever for total color blindness? thats a real pain in the proverbial :rolleyes: