Pedants and Nitpickers

I thought we could at least generate more than one or two line responses in this thread.

Thread? :?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56

I thought we could at least generate more than one or two line responses in this thread.

---

Now you're Nitpicking. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56

I thought we could at least generate more than one or two line responses in this thread.

---

Well,
you've
only
responded
with
one
line.

Is that what they do with school kids?

And hasn't picknicking something to do with tools?

This is confuseing

Gfreg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chesand

I am with TL on this one. Also the incorrect use of "I" and "me"

---

:? ......drives I nuts? :think:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Geoff Dean

:oo: TL has nuts? :oo:

---

Only the ones I am driven too.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Woodwould

"proof's" already has an apostrophe!

---

That one does. But the other one didn't.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56

I thought we could at least generate more than one or two line responses in this thread.

---

We may be pedants and nitpickers, but we are succinct! :p

That sucs

TL I wasn't suggesting that you had used "me" incorrectly in the "I" and "me" comment (or was it a statement)

Eye thort Eye wood help youse lot.

Apostrophes and How to Use Them

Remember the Holden ad years ago?

"When your hot your hot" ungrammaticl drivel.

When I spoke to the local holden dealer he told me that it must be OK because the company had approved it! :o:doh:

:rolleyes: So any grammar questions, just ask a Holden exec.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jmk89

Very well, I'll bite. :D
You appear to have been listening to too much football commentary. The proof isn't in the pudding, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

---

You appear to be wrong. Legends like me had no need to listen to commentary...they say my long arms reached up like giant testicles :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by springwater

You appear to be wrong. Legends like me had no need to listen to commentary...they say my long arms reached up like giant testicles :D

---

:CI'm gonna have bad dreams now.:saddest:







:D

did you dream of giant reaching testicles? But we all know testicles can't reach. It's a terrible metaphor.