No, but every bloke should be able to understand weasel-speak. Even if it is only so we know which monkeys to throw peanuts atQuote:
Originally Posted by Driver
Printable View
No, but every bloke should be able to understand weasel-speak. Even if it is only so we know which monkeys to throw peanuts atQuote:
Originally Posted by Driver
It doesn't. I was merely taking advantage of the fact that I knew - at this time of the evening you'd be halfway down your second bottle of red and ripe for a bit of p!ss-taking. ;) :p :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
Incidentally, which varietal, vineyard and vintage is receiving your patronage this evening, Ginge?
"...understand weasel-speak..." - true. But to USE "weasel-speak" - MA-A-ATE! :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skew ChiDAMN!!
Cleanskin 2005 Merlot from the III Associates, McLarenvale.Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
$6.67 a bottle landed in Cairns. :D (if you buy a hogshead :rolleyes: )
Mate & I went halfs in a Hogshead.
1 x Hopgsheads = 33 cartons= 396 bottles = 198 bottle each. :rolleyes:
We have about 75 bottles left. :D
RRP $18.50 a bottle cellar door. :)
Why Cliff, do you want to drink your wine out of them!:D or just hope that they are shiney?:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
You didn't look at the bottom of the picture did you? :rolleyes: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by baxter
Picture has moved to here.
http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...548#post373548
You got yourself what sounds like a great price. How's it drinking? Any good?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
I'm running a bit low in the red section of the cellar and need to re-stock. When you did that deal, did you get an opportunity to have a bit of a slurp before you bought?
Not really, (I mean, it is drinking fine, I didn't get to try it.) to get the good price, you prebuy & pay it off over 4 months before it arrives.Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
We have had heaps from that winery & none was ever crook so we were going on reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
H'mmm Cliff!
I'd like to see your photo album some time - or is that one of your offspring :D The thing is, can she joint a board?
yes how else would I have noticed that she was wearing sandals that had a back to hold the wine;) ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
For those who have asked...Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
The III Associates, McLaren Vale. http://www.associates.com.au/
Cheers.
Come on Cliff, don't change the subject. Tell us more about the green shoes!
Well, if you can't work it out, you are on ya own mate 'cos if I do try to explain it to you, I'll just get m'self & Benny ('cos he can't help himself) in trouble all over again. :rolleyes: :cool: :D (Hint. The blue bits, not the green bits :rolleyes: )Quote:
Originally Posted by baxter
For anybody who is totally lost, we have to go all the way back to the original question about what to do about the use of the tools by the 'significant other,' & I refered to the Code of Practice 5.4. Decoration. Decoration of a shed is very important...
Make her ('significant other') a decoration. (Means she has to pose nude on the shed wall for about 15 or 16 months but she'll get used to it I'm sure. :D )
BUT only if she ('significant other') has green shoes. (and for the slow ones, blue bits & pink bits like the example.... damn I'm just getting in deeper here. :eek: )
If she is like the example in the green shoes, you may even like to look at section 6.2 Collections. :rolleyes:
Well.... now it sort of looks like I'm waffling 'cos some 'kind helpful sole' has removed the picture of the 'example with green shoes'.... damn :rolleyes: ... now I'll have to start a new thread in OS & link to it. :D
Picture has moved to here.
http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com...548#post373548
BTW Col... while doing my home work to get my facts & figures (no pun intended) straight (Now why would I do that? :rolleyes: What the hell would I do with a straight figure. :confused: ) I found an error in continuity in the code.
Parra 5.4 about decorations refers to para 5.4 in the text & it should refer to para 5.6. Otherwise you have a recursivivity.
Thanks, mate. I'll fix it in the next update. (Could be a while. We haven't had any contributions for some time now).Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
What about a bit in the code about SWMBO's not using a blokes tools! and penalties for those that do. (Not sure about the green shoes!)Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
I had a few pints, after SWMBO used my tools, just to get over it, tried leaning and staring, tried sharpening a few bits and bobs, but I think I might just have a few more (pints) - just in case I'm not over it... :D
Anyone recommend a good Aussie wine? (red of course)? ;)