Originally Posted by Auspiciousdna
Gaza my friend, you too are allowed your opinion as am I, in fact I welcome it in this forum for all to judge the course they may choose to take if need so!
Relax, i agree the whole idea is to have our own opion, i am just trying to let people know what new developments have occuried in the timber floor industry.
<O:p</O:p
If the owner needed a surface to live on, I would supply a temporary floor like formwork of a material that could be reused later on to fit out a work shed or what ever. And if you must know I’ve been at two sites this pass year where this method of fixing was used, thank you!
There is nothing wrong with this but just make sure the sheets are nailed down.
<O:p</O:pI believe the method you’re championing is unnecessary and if you don’t have it, there be no need for a manufactures warranty, the manufacture that would be making money if you used this method. Beside the fact if you needed to get to the sub floor, it would easier to take up a few boards and replaced them, than repairing the glued surface!
You should not have to replace a floor once its down but is possible with the glued ones, just lots of time to get it off.
<O:p</O:pThe retail price catalogue I have for Y/T sheet floor from Mr Ply$60-19mil and $85 for 22mil a sheet, says 3.6 x .9 over an average house plus glue and laying has to be around a $3000 give or take how thick you go and then comes the cost of the surface you see?
Bunnings has if for $36.00 inlcd GSt, most timber yards are under $40.00
<O:p</O:p if you’re happy with the Y/T method I couldn’t be happier for you, but it’s not for me, this is just my opinion you don’t have to like it or agree!<O:p</O:p