A similar web site can be found on the TFS web site in Tassie. I have been involved in fuel reduction burning at various levels for many years and it is unusual to get adverse feedback in relation to these burns. I my time with Parks I've never had an issue with "Greenies" protesting or trying to stop fuel reduction burns(FRB's) and that includes burns in some of our iconic National Parks. There seems to be a wide public acceptance of the need for FRB's. In my experience, the arguments that Greenies are stopping FRB's is BS. Concerns from immediate neighbours are not uncommon but are generally dealt with during the planning process.
Each burn will have its own issues and these are addressed by detailing appropriate weather conditions(wind direction and speed, temperature, humidity) fuel moisture level, ignition details and suppression resources just in case. As a result the decision on which areas to burn is made with one or two days notice based on forecast weather and resource availability. There is a limited window for fuel reduction burning, either Autumn or early Winter when the soils are no longer bone dry, but not too wet, or in spring as the soils are drying out. This window seems to be reducing with the hotter drier conditions of recent years.
In terms of protecting community asserts, its generally smaller strategic burns on the urban interface that have the greatest benefit but the work and negotiating, preparing and executing one of these is substantial. When Governments mandate FRB area targets its much easier to light large remote area from the air than small resource intense burns of a few hectares on the urban interface.
However, when faced with extreme fire weather conditions FRB's can not be relied on for protection. I've seen wildfires stopped by these fuel reduced areas and I've seen wildfires burn straight over them. They certainly have a role in protecting communities in that reducing fule allows firefighters to safely operate under a greater range of weather conditions but FRB's are not a silver bullet and not the solution to our problems the some sections of the media would have us believe.