And don't forget: blobs of sawdust & shavings, held together with glue, lacquer & the occasional nail/screw/lost tool (me :rolleyes: )Quote:
Originally Posted by journeyman Mick
Printable View
And don't forget: blobs of sawdust & shavings, held together with glue, lacquer & the occasional nail/screw/lost tool (me :rolleyes: )Quote:
Originally Posted by journeyman Mick
Looks like the sort of thing a remote rural fire brigade would store its 'appliance' in.
See Attached as an idea/suggestion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
cheers
Wendy
I didn't know you'd been to Wood Borer's shed Wendy. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by rufflyrustic
I reckon one of Saltbush Bill's sheds by Eric Jolliffe should do the trick.Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
I can't find one on the internet in a hurry.
Mick - this sounds like a very good plan. The Code, after all, makes it quite clear that a bloke is in absolute control of all matters pertaining to his shed so it's entirely appropriate that the cover of a given bloke's copy of the Code should fit his particular style.Quote:
Originally Posted by journeyman Mick
For those who want a printed version, I'll have a go at putting one together if I can find a decent illustration.
Waldo - thanks for the pics. All good - except for the distressed dunny - I have to offer you some advice and guidance here. It would be a potentially serious mistake to confuse your shed with your dunny. A dunny only fulfills one of the Code's requirements: that it contains but a single seat. In other respects ......:eek:
Wendy - that's a great photo and is a definite contender.
Cliff - spot on. That's what I had in mind. I'll have a bit of a Google. I'd also like to include the UBeaut logo and I've asked Neil for permission but he hasn't got back to me yet. I know he's been a bit busy lately so I'll give him a rev.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff Rogers
Col
:D I wish :D I've heard you could sink in there and not be found for years ;) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by craigb
It's my Uncle's Shed. Like Father, Uncle, Grandad, Great-Grandad, etc etc etc etc like .... :confused: me :)
Like the A5 format have printed out a copy in that size , works well the size is easy to handle and the font is readable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver
I thought about the cover and I rekon it needs to look official , I mean its "the standard" isn't it you don't want a picture of someone elses shed do you , and if you leave it up to the indivudal well some may not have the time to come up with a quality cover. You can't have a picture of a paticular wood working implement either as some are darksiders and some just burn electrons, so something eye grabing and official with a dire warning that it must be read & adhered to by all who enter, and in recognition of all the time and effort "compiled by Driver" or Col as you preffer and a thumbprint of your avatar or of you looking all stern and blokey.
Rgds
Russell
It’s a wet and miserable morning outdoors and I haven’t got much of a workload today so I’ve been pondering Code-related matters. Here are some thoughts.
On re-reading my post #152 above, I feel I may have given the impression that I was dismissive of the detailed input from havenoideaatall. If so, I apologise. That was not my intention. Brother have raises an interesting point about the potential for a bloke’s shed to be co-opted as a storage area for items of a non-blokely disposition and character. Putting it bluntly, a bloke can’t allow his shed to be filled up with old crap on the whim of non-bloke members of the household. If he chooses to fill it up with old crap :eek: er, that is, potentially useful material of his own, that’s different
However, where Brother have and I differ is in the area of detail. I believe the Code should be a guide, not an instruction manual. It is designed to provide advice and general direction but not to give instructions to fit every situation a bloke may meet.
In that respect, the description ‘Code of Practice’ was carefully selected.
In the area of prescribed behaviour for the community at large there are three levels of guidance:-
Legislation – enshrined in common law and statute and establishing both the boundaries of acceptable behaviour and appropriate punishment for breaches. (Not to be confused with The Laws of Shed Physics – see below).
Regulations – detailing specific rules that are to be followed.
Codes of Practice – setting guidelines and offering advice.
So, when it comes to a bloke and his shed, well, he is in charge and therefore can be considered to have the authority to establish both common law and statute. For regulations – again - a given bloke sets the rules for his own shed.
The Code of Practice is not designed to be prescriptive about shed activities but instead to provide general guidance for all blokes engaged in shed activities – in both their own and other blokes’ sheds. Where the Code occasionally veers into the prescriptive, this tends to be on matters that are well understood by blokes and simply require authoritative confirmation from the Code: in the area of blokely drinks, for instance.
Now, as to the Laws of Shed Physics. Think of the concept of Bistromaths, described by Slartiblartfast in Douglas Adams’ Hitch Hiker series. The Laws of Shed Physics are not laws established by precedent or statute. They are nature’s laws. They are immutable and inviolable. You can’t break the Laws of Shed Physics any more than you can break any other law of nature. To attempt, for example, to place a limit on the number of clamps you might need is as futile as trying to breathe by inhaling water while submerged. Doesn’t work, can’t be done. Dire consequences will follow.
(Incidentally, it’s fairly obvious that the only reason Slartiblartfast isn’t named Slartiblartfart is because Hitch Hiker was originally a radio series broadcast by the BBC, who clearly would have vetoed anything overtly vulgar).
Col the Ponderer
Good points Russell. For those who don't have the time etc, as I said in an earlier post, I'll try to produce something useful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashore
Not so sure about this bit. It's not my Code, it's our Code so I certainly won't be using my avatar or name on the cover. I appreciate the sentiment but that would be wrong. I would like to have a prominent reference to the UBeaut Bulletin Board and I'll be looking for Neil's permission to use the BB's UBeaut logo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashore
Blokes might like to put a simple notice on their shed doors, something like:-
Visitors are advised that
this is a shed and all persons entering
are subject to the Code of Practice.
Col
I know its not your code but you were the Drivering force behind it and have done a mighty job in compiling and editing it , but the decision is yours .
Rgds and thanks for the effort
Hear Hear! A toast to Driver - with, of course, nothing containing bubbles (unless its beer) or an excess of fruit :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashore
Tutti- fruitty baby.
All hail Driver!
Col,
I'm a tad concerned about your blokeliness. First, "toodlepip", now this;
Life Partners? What happened to the "missus" or the "sheila" or even just plain SWMBO. You'll be calling your shed a "studio" soon and serving latte's in it.Quote:
recently a disturbing trend has been reported by blokes whose life partners have suggested that devices be installed in sheds that will allow said life partners
Dan
Hi Driver,
Here's something you may be interested in as a cover picture. Its a scan of a photocopy of a drawing I did many years ago, so the quality is pretty poor.:o The original I gave away, and this B&W is the only copy I have. Original had some colour over the inkwork, and was A3; this is an A4 scan of half the drawing, but may suit your needs.:)
Cheers, and thanks for all your work on the Code!