You said:
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">I dispute that there is any evidence for God. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Then I said:
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">If there is no evidence, then why are you not a 7? </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Then you said:
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER- 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">But there is evidence... </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
okay I did say that :D but what I was trying to say and when put into proper context was there is no evidence for God only against. Hope this dispells any confussion.
Quote:
It is not proof in and of itself
Quote:
On the evidence thing, it's really very simple. Evidence consists of facts that may lead you to believe something to be true. It is not proof in and of itself
I agree, that is why I said I have to conceed the very small possibility of a God.
Quote:
My point was that an atheist has no more proof of the non-existence of god than a theist has of his existence
My point was to stongly support a conclusion you only need more convincing evidence than the other side.
Quote:
You may have evidence that you consider satisfactory to your mind, but it is not proof.
never said it was
Quote:
So how can a logical thinking person rule it out? The best you can say is that it seems to you on the balance of probability that the existence of a god is unlikely. You cannot say he does not exist. Unless you are an atheist. And that is an illogical position.
I havent ruled it out. However only due to the fact that I cant prove non-exsitense. Proportionly I consider that fact to be irrelevent/insignificant when forming a phylosiphy on life.
Quote:
You cannot say he does not exist. Unless you are an atheist. And that is an illogical position.
that statement only deals with absolutes ie. absolute Theism, Agnostism and Atheism. I have already stated that I dont consider atheism to be absolute...there is a spectrum. But if you want to deal with absolutes, that must mean you equally believe in the existance of God and the non exsitance...to me, with available evidence that is illogical.
cheers
BD:2tsup: