Sting wrote..
"Poets, Priests and Politicians,
have words to thank for their positions."
Well, you can add journos, speech writers, teachers and a few other professions. These we could call the wordsmiths. It seems that lately they have become somewhat lax in their use of the words they work with. I think it was LBJ who started with "looking back in retrospect" and now Kevin07 says "This is the single, largest Government initiative of its type." So these guys just quietly try to up the importance of their statements by adding a few superlatives and everyone absorbs these statements, then uses them in everyday speech.
What happens, though, when the meaning of the original word becomes lessened. We now have quite, relatively or very unique.
I actually read a message where someone was trying to stress the importance of his invention by saying, " I want to stress that in comparison to something that is relatively unique, my invention should be regarded as quite or even very unique"..Say what???
Isn't "unique" a word to define something that stands alone and has no peer? I'm sure we can all think of other examples. The lessening of the importance of language means a lessening of the coherence of society. (Big statement but I think it is so.) If the wordsmiths can't get it right, what hope is there for anyone else?:arge:
Regards,
Rob