there seems to be a great diveristy of information about this issue covering every angle possible, whether anyone agrees , disagrees or is bored with the GW issue, its becoming bigger than Ben Hur..
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...080901857.html
http://www.nationnews.com/editorial/307956886721781.phpQuote:
Did Global Warming Cause NYC Tornado?
By DAVID B. CARUSO
The Associated Press
Thursday, August 9, 2007; 7:30 PM
NEW YORK -- Flooded subways? A tornado in Brooklyn? It was tempting to blame it all on global warming.
Plenty of public officials were doing just that in the aftermath of a short but violent thunderstorm that paralyzed the nation's largest mass transit network and tore the roofs off limestone townhouses. But in reality, it is not quite that simple, weather and climate experts say.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-b...-doubt-global-Quote:
Taking note of global warming
Published on: 8/9/07.
IN RECENT TIMES there have been significant variations of weather patterns across the globe and it has spurred serious consideration to a review of global warming. Only recently both Britain and the United States observed very unusual flooding.
Last week, South Asia got its worst monsoon-triggered flooding in decades, with about 28 million people being displaced in India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. There are about 1 900 deaths so far and many homes and farmlands have been submerged.
According to the United Nations (UN) weather agency, many parts of the world have been experiencing record extreme weather conditions, including unusual floods, heatwaves, storms, and cold snaps since the beginning of the year.
Barbados has also been observing a consistently marginal increase in daily temperatures to around 31 degrees Celsius. So much so that many people have been complaining about the heat.
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=46997Quote:
Confirming Limbaugh's Prediction, CBS Ignores Study Casting Doubt on Global Warming
By Brent Baker | August 9, 2007 - 21:06 ET
Two nights after NBC blamed hot summer temperatures on global warming, and on the very day a new scientific report cast doubt on a key assumption behind global warming forecasts, CBS on Thursday evening held global warming culpable for “oppressive August heat” that killed a man in East St. Louis. For an expert assessment, CBS reporter Kelly Cobiella turned only to the Weather Channel climatologist who last year suggested the American Meteorological Society should withhold credentials from any member who dares doubt the man-made global warming mantra: “Dr. Heidi Cullen is a climatologist for the Weather Channel, and sees a definite connection to global warming.” Cullen maintained: “The heat wave that we're seeing now is completely consistent with what we expect in a warmer world because all of our models show us that heat waves will become intense, more frequent, and they'll last longer.”
The CBS Evening News skipped, as Rush Limbuagh predicted the media would, a new study in which, as outlined in a press release, “the widely accepted (albeit unproven) theory that manmade global warming will accelerate itself by creating more heat-trapping clouds is challenged this month in new research from the University of Alabama in Huntsville.” The posting on the university's site summarized the study published in a scientific journal: “Instead of creating more clouds, individual tropical warming cycles that served as proxies for global warming saw a decrease in the coverage of heat-trapping cirrus clouds, says Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist in UAHuntsville's Earth System Science Center.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai.../eaclim109.xmlQuote:
Global Warming Coordinated?
Thursday, August 09, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com
As NewsBusters reported Sunday, Newsweek's current issue featured a cover story blasting anthropogenic global warming skeptics as "deniers," and pointing fingers at companies like ExxonMobil as participating in a coordinated misinformation campaign akin to the tobacco industry misleading citizens about the dangers of cigarette smoking. Shortly after this new issue hit the stands, Al Gore told a forum in Singapore, "the deniers offered a bounty of $10,000 for each article disputing the consensus that people could crank out and get published somewhere." This raises an interesting question: Is this a coordinated attack designed to incite anger in citizens that polls show are not as upset about this issue as the left and their media minions?
http://greenoptions.com/2007/08/08/n...arming_deniersQuote:
Global warming forecast predicts rise in 2014
By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 7:01pm BST 09/08/2007
Have your say Read comments
Here is the climate forecast for the next decade; although global warming will be held in check for a few years, it will come roaring back to send the mercury rising before 2014.
The overall trend in warming is driven by greenhouse gas emissions
Overall warming trend is driven by greenhouse gas emissions
This is the prediction of the first computer model of the global climate designed to make forecasts over a timescale of around a decade, developed by scientists at the Met Office.
The new model developed at the Met's Hadley Centre in Exeter, and described in the journal Science, predicts that warming will slow during the next few years but then speed up again, and that at least half of the years after 2009 will be warmer than 1998, the warmest year on record.
Over the 10-year period as a whole, climate continues to warm and 2014 is likely to be 0.3 deg C warmer than 2004.
http://greenoptions.com/files/110/Newsweek_Cover.jpg
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...000117,00.htmlQuote:
Newsweek Takes On Global Warming "Deniers"
Kelli Best-Oliver's picture
By Kelli Best-Oliver Aug 9, 2007
Imagine my shock when I opened my mailbox to find the latest issue of Newsweek sporting a fire-glowing orb and the headline "Global Warming is a Hoax.*" It's hard to believe (particularly for the GO family) that there are still people who deny that climate change is happening and caused by humans. With the influx of pro-green exposure in the media, many greens saw this past year as the tipping point in awareness and activism on global warming. Yet, "deniers" still exist, and Newsweek's cover story (complete with tongue-in-cheek headline) aims to track the foundations of the denial movement, the major players behind it, and the motivations behind the well-coordinated effort to keep the American public doubting that global warming is real. (That asterisk? It noted "Or so claim well-funded naysayers who still reject the overwhelming evidence of climate change.")
http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinio...530610628.htmlQuote:
Global warming critic hot under the collar
Andrew Bolt
August 10, 2007 12:00am
I AGREE completely with global warming alarmist Robyn Williams.
The ABC would indeed be "verging on the irresponsible" to air something "demonstrably wrong".
And so the ABC should get a new host for its Science Show, if Demonstrably Wrong Williams won't correct himself.
Of course, Williams wasn't asking for the sack when he told the ABC to keep the fact-challenged off the air.
He was just telling the ABC to scrap a documentary in which climate experts said global warming wasn't man-made.
But I see Williams now devotes a page of Cosmos to explain why he told a "notorious newspaper columnist" that global warming could make the seas rise 100m by 2100.
Williams is cross that I've since publicised that absurd claim. But facts are facts: Even the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - the temple of global warming activists - predicts the seas will rise at most by 59cm.
Quote:
Global warming — the new way to turn relationships cold
Richard Glover
August 11, 2007
'WOMEN feel the cold more than men. It's a biological fact." Jocasta is standing in the middle of the kitchen, first thing in the morning, giving me a glacial stare. She wants to know who turned off the heater before we went to bed.
"Studies have proved" — she spits the words out as if trying to warm up her own lips — "that women feel 3.74 degrees colder than men. It's all to do with protecting our babies in the womb."
Where does Jocasta get these studies? Why do they always have figures exact to the second decimal place? And how come they always seem to involve the womb? I amble over to the heater and switch it on.
Jocasta stands over the thing, rubbing her hands together, her breath coming out in little puffs of vapour. "So," she says, "who, exactly, appointed you as Minister for Energy for this family?"
From my position on the other side of the kitchen bench, I sniff haughtily. "We must all do our bit for global warming. We must all reduce our carbon footprint."
