Perhaps I'm an art Luddite.
Just seen ABC TV Lateline, the discussion was on a new piece of Sydney "Street Art".
Cost to the ratepayers to be $11.3 million, ie $11 300 000.00.
I understand that art is all in the eye of the beholder but being described as a cloud, a large bendy bit of steel etc I'm having a little difficulty accepting the so called given concept and am absolutely astounded that this is going to be acceptable to the ratepayers of Sydney.
I've just checked, it's not April 1, perhaps they are just starting early. I could give my interpretation of what I saw but that would probably put this thread into the red room.
For those who have no idea of what I'm referring to, here is a link to the artwork that was the topic for discussion.
Cloud Arch - City Art Sydney
It appears to be that Sydney is not alone in its quest to spend ratepayers hard earned on................
Cloud art sculpture, Sydney: $11m public sculpture funded by taxpayers