I've spent part of the weekend laying down some carpet which was aquired from a skip ( brand new large offcuts of very expensive carpet from a serviced apartment development ). In my opinion the new carpet is infinitely preferable to the revolting old carpet tiles it replaces and I wouldn't be able to justify buying a new carpet for the room which is scheduled for demolition at some point.
Not everyone sees my thrift as a positive characteristic. It appears that some people wouldn't dream of removing anything from a skip to use in their garage, much less their house.
I happily bulk buy tuna and cereal when they are on special, wait for k-mart's 15% sale to come round to make purchases ( having carefully checked that their price for the item is competitive in the first place ) and relish aquiring a bargain - a bargain being something you actually were going to buy anyway - not something you buy because it happens to be cheap. Which means I've then got more money for those things which aren't negotiable on price.
I'm bemused by friends who feel obliged to provide their kids with brand new clothes, brand new toys etc and wouldn't dream of visiting an op shop even though they can't pay off their credit card bills.
Equally bemusing to me are the charitable organisations who knock back furniture offered to them on the grounds that their clientele ( who are supposedly on their uppers ) wouldn't want anything that old fashioned. I'm quite happy to have second hand stuff as an interim measure.
So folks ... what do you think is the difference between someone being "careful" with money and someone being mean ... and do you have any second hand furniture in your house ( and we're ruling out "antiques" here ... which is second hand that has aquired respectability through age ).